Key problems in the development of petroleum electromagnetic logging
ZHANG Yi1,2, FENG Hong2, HAN Xue3, CHEN Gang2, JIANG Bici1,2
1. China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; 2. Xi'an Research Institute of China Coal Techno-logy & Engineering Group Corp, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 3. China Petroleum Logging Co. LTD, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710077, China
Abstract：Induction logging is commonly used in the wireline logging. It has a large detection depth and can be applied to oil-base mud, which plays an irreplaceable role in the petroleum logging. Electromagnetic wave logging is more effective in logging-while-drilling (LWD), and the azimuth electromagnetic wave logging technology can identify interface and distinguish azimuth, which has become one of the key technologies and main research directions of geosteering while drilling. This paper reviews the development of induction logging and electromagnetic logging instruments and points out the characteristics and design differences in design as well as difficulties in hardware design and manufacture of the instruments in each development stage. This paper summarizes the factors that influence the response of petroleum electromagnetic logging and analyzes the similarities and differences between the effects of environmental factors on the induction logging and electromagnetic logging. It considers the relative dip angle and borehole environmental correction as the main factors that influence the application of coplanar or cross components. According to the advantages and disadvantages of the common forward and inversion technology, it is concluded that the lack of fast and reliable forward and inversion technology in the complex strata restricts the application of electromagnetic logging in real-time interpretation and geo-steering. The difficulties in the electromagnetic logging data interpretation and technical upgrading are summarized. Finally, the development vision of the electromagnetic logging is prospected.
Li Y, Sun X, Su G, et al. Numerical simulation and analysis of multicomponent induction logging response in anisotropic formation[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8(1):149345-149361.
Wu Z G, Wang L, Fan Y R, et al. Detection perfor-mance of azimuthal electromagnetic logging while drilling tool in anisotropic media[J]. Applied Geo-physics, 2020, 17(1):1-12.
[4]
解茜草, 仵杰, 高建申.斜井中地质导向电磁波测量数值模拟分析[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2019, 54(3):676-684, 699.XIE Xicao, WU Jie, GAO Jianshen. Numerical simulation of the geo-steering electromagnetic wave measurement while drilling in inclined wells[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2019, 54(3):676-684, 699.
[5]
张妙瑜.复杂地层中三分量阵列感应测井方法研究[D].陕西西安:西安电子科技大学, 2019.
[6]
张盼, 邓少贵, 胡旭飞, 等. 超深随钻方位电磁波测井探测特性及参数敏感性分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2021, 64(6):2210-2219.ZHANG Pan, DENG Shaogui, HU Xufei, et al. Detection performance and sensitivity of logging-while-drilling extra-deep azimuthal resistivity measurement[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2021, 64(6):2210-2219
[7]
汪宏年, 于蕾, 王浩森, 等. 环状刻槽钻铤中随钻方位电磁波响应的混合算法[J]. 地球物理学报, 2021, 64(5):1811-1829.WANG Hongnian, YU Lei, WANG Haosen, et al. A hybrid algorithm for LWD azimuthal electromagnetic responses with annular grooved drill collar[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2021, 64(5):1811-1829.
[8]
姬玉. 随钻电磁波电阻率测井正反演方法研究[D]. 陕西西安:西安石油大学, 2019.
[9]
孙向阳. 非均匀介质中的电磁感应和低频电磁传播问题研究[D].四川成都:电子科技大学, 2008.
[10]
张中庆, 庞兵强.随钻电磁波测井数据处理新方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5):1720-1726.ZAHNG Zhongqing, PANG Bingqiang. A novel approach for electromagnetic logging while drilling data processing[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2014, 44(5):1720-1726.
[11]
Doll H G. Introduction to induction logging and application to logging of wells drilled with oil base mud[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1949, 186(1):148-162.
[12]
Duesterhoeft W C. Propagation effects in induction logging[J]. Geophysics, 1961, 26(2):192-204.
[13]
Moran J H, Kunz K S. Basic theory of induction logging and application to study of two-coil sondes[J]. Geophysics, 1962, 27(6):829-858.
[14]
Gianzero S, Anderson B. A new look at skin effect[C]. SPWLA 22nd Annual Logging Symposium, 1981, 20-34.
[15]
Moran J H. Induction logging-geometrical factors with skin effect[J]. Log Analyst, 1982, 23(6):4-10.
[16]
王洪淼. 三分量感应系统的理论与方法研究[D].陕西西安:西安石油大学, 2006.
[17]
Nan Z Y, Tan M J, Li J, et al. Numerical simulation, response analysis, and physical experiment of induction logging in an inclined fractured formation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2021.3056133.
[18]
Nan Z Y, Li J, Tan M J. Influential factors of inclined fracture induction logging based on numerical simulation and physical experiment[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 2021, doi:10.1080/08123985.2021. 1885293.
[19]
Nan Z Y, Li J, Zhou W N. Study on the effect of fractures on conventional induction log based on physical and numerical simulation[J]. Acta Geodaetica Et Geophysica, 2017, 52(1):131-140.
[20]
Rodney P F, Wisler M M. Electromagnetic wave resistivity MWD tool[J]. SPE Drilling Engineering, 1986, 1(5):337-346.
[21]
Li Q, Omeragic D, Chou L, et al. New directional electromagnetic tool for proactive geosteering and accurate formation evaluation while drilling[C]. SPWLA 46th Annual Logging Symposium, 2005, 26-29.
[22]
吴冲.随钻方位电磁波电阻率测井方法研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2017.
[23]
张晓彬, 戴永寿, 倪卫宁, 等.随钻方位电磁波电阻率测量系统发展进展[J]. 测井技术, 2016, 40(1):12-17.ZHANG Xiaobin, DAI Yongshou, NI Weining, et al. Development of azimuthal propagation resistivity measurement while drilling system[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2016, 40(1):12-17.
Li K, Gao J, Zhao X. Tool design of look-ahead electromagnetic resistivity LWD for boundary identification in anisotropic formation[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 184(1):1-20.
[26]
邓少贵, 蔡联云, 王磊, 等. 基于电阻率敏感性函数的随钻电磁波测井探测特性研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2020, 63(5):2096-2106.DENG Shaogui, CAI Lianyun, WANG Lei, et al. Research on detection characteristics of electromagnetic logging while drilling based on resistivity sensitivity function[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2020, 63(5):2096-2106.
[27]
Li K S, Jie G, Xiao D J, et al. Study on ultra-deep azi-muthal electromagnetic resistivity LWD tool by influence quantification on azimuthal depth of investigation and real signal[J]. Pure & Applied Geophy-sics, 2018, 175(1):1-18.
[28]
张超, 刘国强, 夏正武, 等.长源距随钻定向电磁波测井仪器频率和源距选择方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2018, 33(20):4756-4762.ZHANG Chao, LIU Guoqiang, XIA Zhengwu, et al. Frequency and space selection method for long space directional electromagnetic logging while drilling tools[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(20):4756-4762.
[29]
王成园. 多分量感应测井仪器偏心影响研究[D].山东青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2016.
[30]
张辛耘, 王敬农, 郭彦军.随钻测井技术进展和发展趋势[J]. 测井技术, 2006, 30(1):10-15, 100.ZHANG Xinyun, WANG Jingnong, GUO Yanjun. Advances and trends in logging while drilling technology[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2006, 30(1):10-15, 100.
[31]
吕伟国. 水平井中感应测井、电磁波测井测量响应研究[D]. 吉林长春:吉林大学, 2009.
[32]
Fan Y, Hu X F, Deng S, et al. Logging while drilling electromagnetic wave responses in inclined bedding formation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4):711-719.
[33]
魏宝君, 田坤, 张旭, 等. 定向电磁波传播随钻测量基本理论及其在地层界面预测中的应用[J]. 地球物理学报, 2010, 53(10):2507-2515.WEI Baojun, TIAN Kun, ZHANG Xu, et al. Physics of directional electromagnetic propagation measurements-while-drilling and its application for forecasting formation boundaries[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010, 53(10):2507-2515.
[34]
Gang C, Yiren F, Li Q X. A study of Coalbed Me-thane (CBM) reservoir boundary detections based on azimuth electromagnetic waves[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 179(1):432-443.
[35]
Wu H H, Tang Y. True formation resistivity determination:Fast and simple process to eliminate polarization horn effect on resistivity measurements using azimuthal LWD propagation tool[C]. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Confe-rence, 2015, 1-9.
[36]
杨震, 杨锦舟, 韩来聚.随钻电磁波电阻率测井实时井眼影响校正[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(5):625-629.YANG Zhen, YANG Jinzhou, HAN Laiju. A real-time borehole correction of electromagnetic wave resistivity logging while drilling[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(5):625-629.
[37]
仵杰, 姬玉, 成志刚, 等. 泥浆侵入对随钻电磁波电阻率测井响应的影响[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 35(1):49-54, 61.WU Jie, JI Yu, CHENG Zhigang, et al. Influence of mud invasion on response of electromagnetic wave resistivity logging while drilling[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 35(1):49-54, 61.
[38]
司兆伟, 邓少贵, 林发武, 等. 泥浆侵入各向异性地层阵列侧向测井响应数值模拟[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2020, 55(1):187-196.SI Zhaowei, DENG Shaogui, LIN Fawu, et al. Nu-merical simulation of array laterolog responses in anisotropic formation with mud invasion[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020, 55(1):187-196.
[39]
Aiping W, Qingqing F, Saleh M M, et al. Numerical modeling of electromagnetic wave logging while drilling in deviated well[J]. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2019, 10(5):1799-1809.
[40]
吴爱平. 随钻方位电磁波电阻率测井关键技术研究[D].北京:中国地质大学, 2013.
[41]
张庚骥.感应测井的高次几何因子[J]. 地球物理学报, 1982, 25(4):370-378.ZHANG Gengji. High order geometrical factors of induction logging[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophy-sics, 1982, 25(4):370-378.
[42]
Alumbaugh D L, Wilt M J. A Numerical Feasibility Study of Three-Component Induction Logging for Three Dimensional Imaging About a Single Borehole[R]. Office of Scientific & Information Technical Reports, 1999.
[43]
Alumbaugh D L, Wilt M J. A numerical sensitivity study of three dimensional imaging from a single borehole[J]. Petrophysics, 2001, 42(1):19-31.
[44]
王磊, 范宜仁, 黄瑞, 等. 各向异性介质多分量感应测井三维Born几何因子理论研究[J]. 物理学报, 2015, 64(23):438-448.WANG Lei, FAN Yiren, HUANG Rui, et al. Three dimensional Born geometrical factor of multi-component induction logging in anisotropic media[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(23):430-440.
[45]
白彦. 三维感应测井仪器刻度与井眼影响研究[D].陕西西安:西安石油大学, 2011.
[46]
Moran J H, Gianzero S. Effects of formation aniso-tropy on resistivity-logging measurements[J]. Geophysics, 1979, 44(7):1266-1286.
[47]
Howard A Q. Petrophysics of magnetic dipole fields in an anisotropic earth[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2000, 48(9):1376-1383.
[48]
Zhdanov M, Kennedy D, Peksen E. Foundations of tensor induction well-logging[J]. Petrophysics, 2001, 42(6):588-610.
[49]
Løseth L O, Ursin B. Electromagnetic fields in planarly layered anisotropic media[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2007, 170(1):44-80.
[50]
姚东华, 汪宏年, 杨守文, 等. 用传播矩阵法研究层状正交各向异性地层中多分量感应测井响应[J]. 地球物理学报, 2010, 53(12):3026-3037.YAO Donghua, WANG Hongnian, YANG Shouwen, et al. Study on the response of multi-component induction logging tool in layered orthorhombic anisotropy formations by using propagator matrix method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010, 53(12):3026-3037.
[51]
Hu Y, Yuan F, Wang D, et al. Electromagnetic waves in multilayered generalized anisotropic media[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sen-sing, 2018, 56(10):5758-5766.
[52]
Li N, Hong D, Han W, et al. An analytic algorithm for electromagnetic field in planar-stratified biaxial anisotropic formation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geo-science and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58(3):1644-1653.
[53]
康庄庄, 汪宏年, 王浩森, 等. 用传播矩阵法研究层状交错地层中的多分量感应测井[J]. 地球物理学报, 2020, 63(11):4277-4289.KANG Zhuangzhuang, WANG Hongnian, WANG Haosen, et al. Study of multi-component induction logging in layered crossbedding formation using the propagation matrix method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2020, 63(11):4277-4289.
[54]
Anderson B I, Barber T D, Gianzero S C. The effect of crossbedding anisotropy on induction tool response[J]. Petrophysics, 2001, 42(2):137-149.
[55]
范宜仁, 胡旭飞, 邓少贵, 等. 倾斜层理地层随钻电磁波测井响应特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4):675-683.FAN Yiren, HU Xufei, DENG Shaogui, et al. Logging while drilling electromagnetic wave responses in inclined bedding formation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4):675-683.
[56]
Hu X F, Fan Y R, Deng S G, et al. Electromagnetic logging response in multilayered formation with arbitrary uniaxially electrical anisotropy[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58(3):2071-2083.
[57]
Gianzero S, Kennedy D, Gao L, et al. The response of a triaxial induction sonde in a biaxial anisotropic medium[J]. Petrophysics, 2002, 43(3):172-183.
[58]
Yuan N, Nie X C, Liu R, et al. Simulation of full responses of a triaxial induction tool in a homogeneous biaxial anisotropic formation[J]. Geophysics, 2010, 75(2):E101-E114.
[59]
邓少贵, 刘天淋, 王磊, 等.双轴各向异性介质多分量感应测井响应快速计算[J]. 地球物理学报, 2020, 63(1):362-373.DENG Shaogui, LIU Tianlin, WANG Lei, et al. Ana-lytical solution of multicomponent induction logging response in biaxial anisotropic medium[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2020, 63(1):362-373.
[60]
Chew W C. Response of a current loop antenna in an invaded borehole[J]. Geophysics, 1984, 49(1):81-91.
[61]
Lovell J R, Chew W C. Response of a point source in a multicylindrcally layered medium[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 1987, 25(6):850-858.
[62]
Lovell J R, Chew W C. Effect of tool eccentricity on some electrical well-logging tools[J]. IEEE Tran-sactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1990, 28(1):127-136.
[63]
Hagiwara T, Banning E J, Ostermeier R M, et al. Effects of mandrel, borehole, and invasion for tilt-coil antennas[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2005, 8(3):255-263.
[64]
Hue Y K, Teixeira F L. Analysis of tilted-coil eccentric borehole antennas in cylindrical multilayered formations for well-logging applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation, 2006, 54(4):1058-1064.
[65]
Liu G S, Teixeira F L, Zhang G J. Analysis of directional logging tools in anisotropic and multieccentric cylindrically-layered earth formations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation, 2012, 60(1):318-327.
[66]
Moon H, Teixeira F L, Donderici B. Stable pseudo-analytical computation of electromagnetic fields from arbitrarily-oriented dipoles in cylindrically stratified media[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 273(1):118-142.
[67]
Moon H, Teixeira F L, Donderici B. Stable evaluation of Green's functions in cylindrically stratified regions with uniaxial anisotropic layers[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 325(7439):174-200.
[68]
张雷, 王健, 陈晶, 等. 双单轴各向异性地层中定向电磁波测井的井中偏心模型计算及影响因素分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(4):1711-1720.ZHANG Lei, WANG Jian, CHEN Jing, et al. Nume-rical modeling and analysis of directional electromagnetic logging tools in eccentric borehole with doubly uniaxial medium around[J]. Progress in Geophy-sics, 2017, 32(4):1711-1720.
[69]
杨守文, 姚东华, 马寅芝, 等. 水平层状各向异性地层多分量感应测井数据的快速参数化反演算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(增刊2):407-416.YANG Shouwen, YAO Donghua, MA Yinzhi, et al. The fast parameterized inversion of multicomponent induction logging data in anisotropically horizontal layered formation[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(S2):407-416.
[70]
谭茂金, 张庚骥. 用模式匹配法计算电阻率测井响应研究进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2006, 21(1):208-213.TAN Maojin, ZHANG Gengji. Progress in numerical mode-matching method of electrical logs[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2006, 21(1):208-213.
[71]
高杰, 柯式镇, 魏宝君, 等.电法测井数值模拟现状及发展趋势分析[J]. 测井技术, 2010, 34(1):1-5.GAO Jie, KE Shizhen, WEI Baojun, et al. Introduction to numerical simulation of electrical logging and its development trend[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2010, 34(1):1-5.
[72]
顿月芹, 贺飞. 电法测井三维数值模式匹配法研究进展[J]. 济南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 30(2):89-94.DUN Yueqin, HE Fei. Progress in 3D numerical mode-matching method of electrical logging[J]. Journal of University of Jinan (Science and Techno-logy), 2016, 30(2):89-94.
[73]
Canabarro M S, Rosa G S, Bergmann J R, et al. Some recent improvements in modeling of electromagnetic well-logging sensors via numerical mode-matching[C]. International Microwave and Opto-electronics Conference, IEEE, 2017, 1-5.
[74]
Pudensi M, Ferreira L G. Method to calculate the reflection and transmission of guided waves[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1982, 72(1):126-130.
[75]
Chew W C, Zai P N, Qing H L, et al. An efficient solution for the response of electrical well logging tools in a complex environment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1991, 29(2):308-313.
[76]
Liu Q H, Chew W C. Diffraction of nonaxisymme-tric waves in cylindrically layered media by horizontal discontinuities[J]. Radio Science, 1992, 27(4):616-626.
[77]
张庚骥, 汪涵明. 普通电阻率测井的数值模式匹配解法[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, 20(2):23-29.ZHANG Gengji, WANG Hanming. Solution of the normal resistivity logging with the mumerical mode-matching method[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, 1996, 20(2):23-29.
[78]
谭茂金, 张庚骥, 赵文杰. 用新型模式匹配法计算地球物理中的电磁场[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2006, 29(5):6-10.TAN Maojin, ZHANG Gengji, ZHANG Wenjie. An improved NMM method for electro-magnetic field calculation in geophysics[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2006, 29(5):6-10.
[79]
汪宏年, 陶宏根, 姚敬金, 等. 用模式匹配算法研究层状各向异性倾斜地层中多分量感应测井响应[J]. 地球物理学报, 2008, 51(5):1591-1599.WANG Hongnian, TAO Honggen, YAO Jingjin, et al. Study on the response of a multicomponent induction logging tool in deviated and layered anisotropic formations by using numerical mode matching method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2008, 51(5):1591-1599.
[80]
Liu Q H. Electromagnetic field generated by off-axis source in a cylindrically medium with an arbitrary number of horizontal discontinuities[J]. Geophy-sics, 1993, 58(5):616-626.
[81]
Liu Q H, Weng C C. Numerical mode-matching method for the multiregion vertically stratified media[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 1990, 38(4):498-506.
[82]
杨震. 非均匀复杂地层随钻电磁波测井响应研究[D].山东青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2009.
[83]
邢光龙, 刘伟宁. Hermite多尺度函数在普通电阻率测井模式匹配法中的应用[J]. 燕山大学学报, 2011, 35(3):245-251.XING Guanglong, LIU Weining. Application of Hermite multiscalets in mode-matching method for normal resistivity logging[J]. Journal of Yanshan University, 2011, 35(3):245-251.
[84]
Wang H, Tao H, Yao J, et al. Efficient and reliable simulation of multicomponent induction logging response in horizontally stratified inhomogeneous TI formations by numerical mode matching method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sen-sing, 2012, 50(9):3383-3395.
[85]
汪宏年, 胡平, 陶宏根, 等.水平层状非均质横向同性地层中阵列多分量感应测井响应的快速计算[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(2):717-726.WANG Hongnian, HU Ping, TAO Honggen, et al. Fast algorithm of responses of array multicomponent induction logging tool in horizontally stratified inhomogeneous TI media[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55(2):717-726.
[86]
Yueqin D, Kong Y. The Comparisons between the Improved Numerical Mode-matching Method(NMM) and the Traditional NMM Using for Resistivity Logging[M]. Springer, Singapore, 2015.
[87]
Hue Y, Teixeira F L. Numerical mode-matching method for tilted-coil antennas in cylindrically layered ani-sotropic media with multiple horizontal beds[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sen-sing, 2007, 45(8):2451-2462.
[88]
林蔺, 杨守文, 白彦, 等.水平层状非均质TI地层中仪器偏心情况下三维感应测井响应高效数值模拟与响应特征分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60(5):2000-2010.LIN Lin, YANG Shouwen, BAI Yan, et al. Efficient simulation and response analysis of three-dimensional induction logging in horizontally layered inhomo-geneous TI formation with instrument eccentricity[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017, 60(5):2000-2010.
[89]
朱天竹, 杨守文, 白彦, 等. 利用2.5维数值模式匹配算法高效高精度建立垂直井眼中多分量阵列感应井眼校正库[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60(3):1221-1233.ZHU Tianzhu, YANG Shouwen, BAI Yan, et al. Efficient and high-precision establishment of borehole correction database for multicomponent array induction in vertical boreholes by a 2.5D NMM algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017, 60(3):1221-1233.
[90]
邓少贵, 蔡联云, 王磊, 等.基于电阻率敏感性函数的随钻电磁波测井探测特性研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2020, 63(5):2096-2106.DENG Shaogui, CAI Lianyun, WANG Lei, et al. Research on detection characteristics of electromagnetic logging while drilling based on resistivity sensitivity function[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2020, 63(5):2096-2106.
[91]
Yee K S. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Pro-pagation, 1966, 14(5):302-307.
Newman G A, Alumbaugh D L. Three-dimensional induction logging problems, Part 2, A finite diffe-rence solution[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67(2):484-491.
[94]
Weiss C J, Newman G A. Electromagnetic induction in a fully 3-D anisotropic earth[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67(4):1104-1114.
[95]
Hou J, Mallan R K, Torres-Verdín C. Finite-diffe-rence simulation of borehole EM measurements in 3D anisotropic media using coupled scalar-vector potentials[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(5):G225-G233.
李娜, 李振春, 黄建平, 等. Lebedev网格与标准交错网格耦合机制下的复杂各向异性正演模拟[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2014, 49(1):121-131.LI Na, LI Zhenchun, HUANG Jianping, et al. Numerical simulation with coupling Lebedev and stan-dard staggered grid schemes for complex anisotropic media[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2014, 49(1):121-131.
[98]
Weidelt P. 3-D Conductivity Models:Implications of Electrical Anisotropy[M]. SEG, 1999.
[99]
Davydycheva S, Druskin V. Staggered Grid for Maxwell's Equations in Arbitrary 3-D Inhomogeneous Anisotropic Media[M]. SEG, 1999.
[100]
Davydycheva S, Druskin V, Habashy T. An efficient finite-difference scheme for electromagnetic logging in 3D anisotropic inhomogeneous media[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(5):1525-1536.
[101]
Hu L, Hua W. Investigation of eccentricity effects and depth of investigation of azimuthal resistivity LWD tools using 3D finite difference method[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2016, 143(1):211-225.
[102]
Wu Z, Deng S, He X, et al. Numerical simulation and dimension reduction analysis of electromagnetic logging while drilling of horizontal wells in complex structures[J]. Petroleum Science, 2020, 17(1):645-657.
[103]
Davydycheva S, Frenkel M A. Review of 3D EM mode-ling and interpretation methods for triaxial induction and propagation resistivity well logging tools[J]. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium Proceedings, 2010, 1(1):390-396.
[104]
Wang T, Yu L, Fanini O, et al. Multicomponent induction response in a borehole environment[J]. Geo-physics, 2001, 68(5):1510-1518.
[105]
汪功礼, 张庚骥, 崔锋修, 等. 三维感应测井响应计算的交错网格有限差分法[J]. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46(4):561-567.WANG Gongli, ZHANG Gengji, CUI Fengxiu, et al. Application of staggered grid finite difference method to the computation of 3-D induction logging response[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2003, 46(4):561-567.
[106]
沈金松.用交错网格有限差分法计算三维频率域电磁响应[J]. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46(2):281-288, 294.SHEN Jinsong. Modeling of the 3-D electromagnetic responses in frequency domain by using staggered-grid finite diference method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2003, 46(2):281-288, 294.
[107]
Hwa O L, Teixeira F L. Cylindrical FDTD analysis of LWD tools through anisotropic dipping-layered earth media[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2007, 45(2):383-388.
[108]
Vladimir P, Jelena K, Josep D L P, et al. A parallel finite-element method for three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic forward modelling[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2013, 193(2):678-693.
[109]
Pridmore D, Hohmann G, Ward S, et al. An investigation of finite-element modeling for electrical and electromagnetic data in three dimensions[J]. Geophysics, 1981, 46(7):1009-1024.
[110]
Nedelec J C. Mixed finite elements in R3[J]. Numerische Mathematik, 1980, 35(1):315-341.
Everett M E, Badea E A, Shen L C, et al. 3-D finite element analysis of induction logging in a dipping formation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 2001, 39(10):2244-2252.
[113]
Badea E A, Everett M E, Newman G A, et al. Finite-element analysis of controlled-source electromagnetic induction using Coulomb-gauged potentials[J]. Geophysics, 2001, 66(3):786-799.
[114]
孙向阳, 聂在平, 赵延文, 等.用矢量有限元方法模拟随钻测井仪在倾斜各向异性地层中的电磁响应[J]. 地球物理学报, 2008, 51(5):1600-1607.SUN Xiangyang, NIE Zaiping, ZHAO Yanwen, et al. The electromagnetic modeling of logging-while-drilling tool in tilted anisotropic formations using vector finite element method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2008, 51(5):1600-1607.
[115]
Xiangyang S, Zaiping N. Vector finite element ana-lysis of multicomponent induction response in anisotropic formations[J]. Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 2008, 81(1):21-39.
[116]
张中庆, 穆林雪, 张雪, 等.矢量有限元素法在随钻电阻率测井模拟中的应用[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(4):64-71.ZHANG Zhongqing, MU Linxue, ZHANG Xue, et al. Application of vector finite element method to simulate logging-while-drilling resistivity tools[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Natural Science Edition), 2011, 35(4):64-71.
[117]
王健, 陈浩, 王秀明, 等. 有限元感应测井模拟的背景场选择方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(6):2177-2187.WANG Jian, CHEN Hao, WANG Xiuming, et al. Research on selection method of background field for finite element simulation of induction logging[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(6):2177-2187.
[118]
王健, 陈浩, 王秀明. 用于固体矿床多分量感应测井响应模拟的矢量有限元法[J]. 地球物理学报, 2016, 59(1):355-367.WANG Jian, CHEN Hao, WANG Xiuming. Response modeling of multi-component induction logging tool in the mineral logging using vector finite element[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2016, 59(1):355-367.
[119]
Chaumont-Frelet T, Pardo D, Rodríguez-Rozas. Finite element simulations of logging-while-drilling and extra-deep azimuthal resistivity measurements using non-fitting grids[J]. Computational Geosciences, 2018, 22(5):1161-1174.
[120]
Harrington R F. Field Computation by Moment Me-thods[M].Macmillan, New York, 1968, 1-98.
[121]
Singer B S. Method for solution of Maxwell's equations in non-uniform media[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1995, 120(3):590-598.
[122]
Avdeev D B, Kuvshinov A V, Pankratov O V, et al. Three-dimensional induction logging problems, Part I:An integral equation solution and model comparisons[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67(2):413-426.
[123]
Dmitry A, Sergei K. 3D integral equation modeling with a linear dependence on dimensions[J]. Geophysics, 2009, 74(5):F89-F94.
[124]
Nie X C, Yuan N, Liu R. A fast integral equation solver for 3D induction well logging in formations with large conductivity contrasts[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2013, 61(3):645-657.
[125]
Hu Y Y, Fang Y, Wang D Z, et al. The scattering of electromagnetic fields from anisotropic objects embedded in anisotropic multilayers[J]. IEEE Tran-sactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2019, 67(12):7561-7568.
[126]
魏宝君. 利用积分方程计算阵列感应测井响应[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 29(6):32-37.WEI Baojun. Computation of array induction logging response using integral equations[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum(Natural Science Edition), 2005, 29(6):32-37.
[127]
Abubakar A, Berg P M V D, Habashy T M. An integral equation approach for 2.5-dimensional forward and inverse electromagnetic scattering[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2006, 165(1):744-762.
[128]
Dyatlov G, Onegova E, Dashevsky Y. Efficient 2.5D electromagnetic modeling using boundary integral equations[J]. Geophysics, 2015, 80(3):E163-E173.
[129]
Wang H, Huang W F, Fang Y, et al. Efficient and accurate electromagnetic modeling of triaxial induction responses from multiscale fractures for well-logging applications[J]. IEEE Journal on Multiscale and Multiphysics Computational Techniques, 2019, 4(1):20-28.
[130]
刘云鹤, 殷长春, 蔡晶, 等. 电磁勘探中各向异性研究现状和展望[J]. 地球物理学报, 2018, 61(8):3468-3487.LIU Yunhe, YIN Changchun, CAI Jing, et al. Review on research of electrical anisotropy in electromagnetic prospecting[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2018, 61(8):3468-3487.
[131]
Habashy T M, Abubakar A. A general framework for constraint minimization for the inversion of electromagnetic measurements[J]. Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 2004, 46(1):265-312.
[132]
康俊佐, 邢光龙, 杨善德.电磁传播电阻率测井的二维全参数反演方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2006, 49(1):275-283.KANG Junzuo, XING Guanglong, YANG Shande. A study on the two-dimensional full-parameter inversion method of the electromagnetic propagation resistivity logging[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2006, 49(1):275-283.
[133]
王卫, 廖东良, 仵杰.基于Born几何因子的阵列感应反演研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2011, 33(8):82-85.WANG Wei, LIAO Dongliang, WU Jie. Inversion of array induction based on Born geometric factor[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2011, 33(8):82-85.
[134]
Lei W, Yiren F, Chao Y, et al. Selection criteria and feasibility of the inversion model for azimuthal electromagnetic logging while drilling (LWD)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5):974-982.
[135]
Meyer W H. Inversion of 2MHz propagation resistivity logs in dipping thin beds[C]. SPWLA 33rd Annual Logging Symposium, 1992, 155-160.
[136]
Pardo D, Torres-Verdín C. Fast 1D inversion of logging-while-drilling resistivity measurements for improved estimation of formation resistivity in high-angle and horizontal wells[J]. Geophysics, 2015, 80(2):E111-E124.
[137]
王磊, 范宜仁, 袁超, 等. 随钻方位电磁波测井反演模型选取及适用性[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5):914-922.WANG Lei, FAN Yiren, YUAN Chao, et al. Selection criteria and feasibility of the inversion model for azimuthal electromagnetic logging while drilling (LWD)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5):914-922.
[138]
Zhou Q. Audio-frequency Electromagnetic Tomography for Reservoir Evaluation[M]. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1989.
[139]
Alumbaugh D L, Morrison H F. Electromagnetic conductivity imaging with an iterative Born inversion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 1993, 31(4):758-763.
Chew W C, Wang Y M. Reconstruction of two-dimensional permittivity distribution using the distorted Born iterative method[J]. IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging, 1990, 9(2):218-225.
[143]
Chew W C, Liu Q H. Inversion of induction tool mea-surements using the distorted Born iterative method and CG-FFHT[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1994, 32(4):878-884.
[144]
Haddadin O S, Ebbini E S. Imaging strongly scattering media using a multiple frequency distorted Born iterative method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics & Frequency Control, 1998, 45(6):1485-1496.
[145]
Nie Z, Zhang Y. Hybrid Born iterative method in low frequency inverse scattering problem[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1998, 36(3):749-753.
[146]
Nie Z, Yang F, Zhao Y, et al. Variational Born iteration method and its applications to hybrid inversion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2000, 38(4):1709-1715.
[147]
Hu Z, Chao W, Li E. Modification of enhanced distorted Born iterative method for the 2D inverse problem[J]. IET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation, 2016, 10(10):1036-1042.
[148]
Cui T J, Chew W C, Aydiner A A, et al. Inverse scattering of two-dimensional dielectric objects buri-ed in a lossy earth using the distorted Born iterative method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2001, 39(2):339-346.
[149]
Li F, Liu Q H, Song L P. Three-dimensional reconstruction of objects buried in layered media using Born and distorted Born iterative methods[J]. IEEE Geoscience & Remote Sensing Letters, 2004, 1(2):107-111.
[150]
陈丽虹, 孙建国, 吴燕冈, 等. 地球物理反演的拟线性近似方法综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2002, 17(3):464-472.CHEN Lihong, SUN Jianguo, WU Yangang, et al. Review of quasi-linear approximation in geophysical inversion[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2002, 17(3):464-472.
[151]
Gauss C F. Theory of the Motion of the Heavenly Bodies Moving about the Sun in Conic Sections[M]. Dover, New York, 1809.
[152]
邢光龙, 张美玲, 刘曼芬, 等.利用高频电磁波测井反演地层介电常数和电阻率[J]. 地球物理学报, 2002, 45(3):435-443.XING Guanglong, ZHANG Meiling, LIU Manfen, et al. An inversion of dielectric constant and resistivity by using high frequency electromagnetic wave logging[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2002, 45(3):435-443.
[153]
Abubakar A, Habashy T M, Druskin V, et al. A 3D parametric inversion algorithm for triaxial induction data[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(1):G1-G9.
[154]
胡旭飞, 范宜仁, 吴非, 等. 随钻方位电磁波测井多参数快速反演[J]. 地球物理学报, 2018, 61(11):4690-4701.HU Xufei, FAN Yiren, WU Fei, et al. Fast multiple parameter inversion of azimuthal LWD electromagnetic measurement[J]. Chinese Journal of Geo-physics, 2018, 61(11):4690-4701.
[155]
Michael T, Daevat O. 2D lateral imaging inversion for directional electromagnetic logging-while-drilling measurements[J]. Geophysics, 2019, 84(6):217-230.
[156]
Yong W. Gauss-Newton Method[M]. Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, 415-419.
[157]
张美玲, 邢光龙, 刘曼芬, 等.阻尼型高斯-牛顿法及其在高频电磁波测井反演中的应用[J]. 计算物理, 2002, 19(2):155-158.ZHANG Meiling, XING Guanglong, LIU Manfen, et al. Damping Gauss-Newton method and its application to the inversion of high frequency electromagnetic wave logging[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2002, 19(2):155-158.
[158]
Dupuis C, Denichou J M. Automatic inversion of deep-directional-resistivity measurements for well placement and reservoir description[J]. The Leading Edge, 2015, 34(5):504-506, 508.
[159]
Thiel M, Omeragic D. High-fidelity real-time imaging with electromagnetic logging-while-drilling measurements[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computational Ima-ging, 2017, 3(2):369-378.
[160]
Xing G, Xue J. A hybrid method for electromagnetic propagated resistivity logging data inversion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sen-sing, 2007, 45(3):649-655.
[161]
Thiel M, Omeragic D, Habashy T. Robust nonlinear parametric Gauss-Newton inversion for well-logging applications[C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2012, 31:454-458.
[162]
Zhang Z, Yuan N, Liu C R. 1-D inversion of triaxial induction logging in layered anisotropic formation[J]. Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 2012, 44(1):383-403.
[163]
Lei W, Hu L, Yiren F, et al. Sensitivity analysis and inversion processing of azimuthal resistivity logging-while-drilling measurements[J]. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2018, 15(1):2339-2349.
