基于HTI介质走时反演的各向异性参数建模与AVAZ反演

doi:10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2023.04.020

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (7998 KB) HTML []
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要传统的各向异性反演方法主要利用测井资料和层位数据通过插值构建初始模型，其模型精度较低。为此，针对地震各向异性反演的初始模型的建立问题，在HTI介质假设下，利用炮检距矢量片（OVT）数据的走时信息获取各向异性参数（ε、δ），然后基于各向异性参数之间的经验关系估计另外一个各向异性参数γ，从而建立初始各向异性参数模型。再利用各向同性反演获得的弹性参数建立初始弹性参数模型。最后，基于Rüger反射系数近似公式，利用高斯-牛顿法反演弹性参数和各向异性参数。模型数据与实际数据的应用表明，所提方法可以在不受测井数据约束的情况下实现高精度的各向异性参数反演，为获取裂缝性储层中的微裂缝信息提供依据。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	周城
	杨宇勇
	周怀来
	王元君
	陶柏丞
	余沛林

关键词 ： HTI介质, OVT数据, 裂缝型储层, 弹性参数, 各向异性参数, 初始模型, 反演

Abstract：Traditional methods for anisotropic inversion primarily rely on well logging data and layer information to construct initial models through interpolation, resulting in low model accuracy. To address this issue in establishing the initial model of seismic anisotropic inversion, under the assumption of horizontal transverse isotropy(HTI) medium, the travel-time information from offset vector tile(OVT) data is utilized to extract anisotropic parameters(ε and δ). Then, another anisotropic parameter γ is estimated based on the empirical relationship between the anisotropic parameters, so as to establish an initial anisotropic parameter model. Furthermore, an initial elastic parameter model is established by using the elastic parameters obtained from isotropic inversion. Finally, On the basis of the Rüger approximation formula for reflection coefficients, the elastic parameters and anisotropic parameters are retrieved by the Gauss-Newton method. Application of the proposed method to model and real data demonstrates its ability to achieve high-precision anisotropic parameter inversion without being constrained by well logging data, providing a basis for acquiring micro-fracture information in fractured reservoirs.

Key words： HTI media OVT data fractured reservoir elastic parameters anisotropic parameters initial model inversion

收稿日期: 2022-09-14

PACS:

P631

基金资助:本项研究受国家自然科学基金项目“含直立裂缝页岩储层横波分裂频变响应机理及裂缝尺度预测研究”（42204138）和四川省自然科学基金青年基金项目“含一组直立裂缝正交各向异性介质的多波响应与裂缝预测”（2022NSFSC1150）联合资助。

通讯作者: 杨宇勇,四川省成都市成华区二仙桥东三路1号成都理工大学地球物理学院,610059。Email:yangyuyong19@cdut.edu.cn E-mail: yangyuyong19@cdut.edu.cn

作者简介: 周城硕士研究生,1996年生;2020年获山东科技大学资源与土木工程系测绘工程专业学士学位;现在成都理工大学地球物理学院攻读地质工程专业硕士学位,研究方向为地震各向异性反演。

引用本文:

周城, 杨宇勇, 周怀来, 王元君, 陶柏丞, 余沛林. 基于HTI介质走时反演的各向异性参数建模与AVAZ反演[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2023, 58(4): 949-960,969. ZHOU Cheng, YANG Yuyong, ZHOU Huailai, WANG Yuanjun, TAO Bocheng, YU Peilin. Modeling of anisotropic parameters based on HTI medium travel-time inversion and AVAZ inversion. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2023, 58(4): 949-960,969.

链接本文:

http://www.ogp-cn.com/CN/10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2023.04.020 或 http://www.ogp-cn.com/CN/Y2023/V58/I4/949

[1]	WANG L, WEI J, HUANG P, et al. Seismic prediction method of multiscale fractured reservoir[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2018, 15(2):240-252.
[2]	何峰, 龙凡, 韩刚, 等. 基于宽方位地震数据的纵、横波速度方位各向异性对比研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2021, 56(2):289-294, 301.HE Feng, LONG Fan, HAN Gang, et al. Comparision of azimuthal anisotropy of P-wave and S-wave velocity based on wide azimuth seismic data[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2021, 56(2):289-294, 301.
[3]	BAHORICH M S, FARMER S L. 3-D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features:the coherence cube[J]. The Leading Edge, 1995, 14(10):1053-1058.
[4]	MURRAY G H, Jr. Quantitative fracture study:Sanish Pool, McKenzie County, North Dakota[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1968, 52(1):57-65.
[5]	COLORNI A, DORIGO M, MANIEZZO V. Distributed optimization by ant colonies[C]. Proceedings of ECAL91-European Conference on Artificial Life, 1991, 134-142.
[6]	THOMSEN L. Elastic anisotropy due to aligned cracks in porous rock[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1995, 43(6):805-829.
[7]	SKOPINTSEVA L, ALKHALIFAH T. An analysis of AVO inversion for postcritical offsets in HTI media[J]. Geophysics, 2013, 78(3):N11-N20.
[8]	周晓越, 甘利灯, 杨昊, 等. 利用叠前振幅和速度各向异性的联合反演方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2020, 55(5):1084-1091.ZHOU Xiaoyue, GAN Lideng, YANG Hao, et al. A joint inversion method using amplitude and velocity anisotropy[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020, 55(5):1084-1091.
[9]	公亭, 王兆磊, 罗文山, 等. 横波源三维地震资料矢量横波四分量旋转和快慢波分离技术[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2022, 57(5):1028-1034.GONG Ting, WANG Zhaolei, LUO Wenshan, et al. Four-component rotation and fast-slow wave separation techniques for 3D vector S-wave seismic data of Swave sources[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2022, 57(5):1028-1034.
[10]	符志国, 黄建国, 廖娟, 等. 基于二维三分量资料的裂缝预测[J]. 石油物探, 2013, 52(2):212-216, 228.FU Zhiguo, HUANG Jianguo, LIAO Juan, et al. Fracture prediction by using 2D3C seismic data[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2013, 52(2):212-216, 228.
[11]	HALL S A, KENDALL J M. Fracture characterization at Valhall:Application of P-wave amplitude variation with offset and azimuth (AVOA) analysis to a 3D ocean-bottom data set[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(4):1150-1160.
[12]	杨晓, 王真理, 喻岳钰. 裂缝型储层地震检测方法综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2010, 25(5):1785-1794.YANG Xiao, WANG Zhenli, YU Yueyu. The overview of seismic techniques in prediction of fracture reservoir[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2010, 25(5):1785-1794.
[13]	王洪求, 杨午阳, 谢春辉, 等. 不同地震属性的方位各向异性分析及裂缝预测[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2014, 49(5):925-931.WANG Hongqiu, YANG Wuyang, XIE Chunhui, et al. Azimuthal anisotropy analysis of different seismic attributes and fracture prediction[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2014, 49(5):925-931.
[14]	于晓东, 桂志先, 汪勇, 等. 叠前AVAZ裂缝预测技术在车排子凸起的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2019, 54(3):624-633.YU Xiaodong, GUI Zhixian, WANG Yong, et al. Prestack AVAZ fracture prediction applied in Chepaizi Uplift[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2019, 54(3):624-633.
[15]	付欣, 张小龙, 孙云强, 等. 基于双差反演策略的时移地震AVO反演[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2022, 57(4):888-896.FU Xin, ZHANG Xiaolong, SUN Yunqing, et al. Time-lapse seismic AVO inversion based on a double difference inversion strategy[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2022, 57(4):888-896.
[16]	CAI P, TSVANKIN I. Joint migration velocity analysis of PP-and PS-waves for VTI media[J]. Geophysics, 2013, 78(5):WC123-WC135.
[17]	张广智, 陈怀震, 王琪, 等. 基于碳酸盐岩裂缝岩石物理模型的横波速度和各向异性参数预测[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(5):1707-1715.ZHANG Guangzhi, CHEN Huaizhen, WANG Qi, et al. Estimation of S-wave velocity and anisotropic parameters using fractured carbonate rock physics model[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(5):1707-1715.
[18]	GE Z, PAN S, LIU J, et al. Estimation of brittleness and anisotropy parameters in transversely isotropic media with vertical axis of symmetry[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 2021, doi:10.1109/tgrs. 2021.3073162.
[19]	SUN Y, CHEN S, LI Y, et al. Shale rocks brittleness index prediction method using extended elastic im-pedance inversion[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2021, doi:10.1016/j. jappgeo. 2021.104314.
[20]	SENA A G. Seismic traveltime equations for azimuthally anisotropic and isotropic media:Estimation of interval elastic properties[J]. Geophysics, 1991, 56(12):2090-2101.
[21]	赵爱华, 丁志峰. 一种弱各向异性介质地震波群速度的近似表示新方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2005, 20(4):916-919.ZHAO Aihua, DING Zhifeng. New approximate expressions of seismic group velocities for weakly anisotropic media[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2005, 20(4):916-919.
[22]	DIX C H. Seismic velocities from surface measurements[J]. Geophysics, 1955, 20(1):68-86.
[23]	SONDERGELD C H, RAI C S. Elastic anisotropy of shales[J]. The Leading Edge, 2011, 30(3):324-331.
[24]	LU M, TANG J, YANG H, et al. P-wave travel-time analysis and Thomsen parameters inversion in orthorhombic media[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2005, 48(5):1247-1252.
[25]	RÜGER A, Tsvankin I. Using AVO for fracture detection:Analytic basis and practical solutions[J]. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(10):1429-1434.
[26]	RÜGER A. Variation of P-wave reflectivity with offset and azimuth in anisotropic media[J]. Geophysics, 1998, 63(3):935-947.
[27]	LU J, WANG Y, CHEN J, et al. Joint anisotropic am-plitude variation with offset inversion of PP and PS seismic data[J]. Geophysics, 2018, 83(2):N31-N50.
[28]	TSUNEYAMA F, MAVKO G. Velocity anisotropy estimation for brine-saturated sandstone and shale[J]. The Leading Edge, 2005, 24(9):882-888.
[29]	THOMSEN L. Weak elastic anisotropy[J]. Geophysics, 1986, 51(10):1954-1966.