Calibration of double-emission and single-receiving resonant electromagnetic wave logging coil system
ZHAO Zhizhong1,2, XING Bowen1,2,3, ZHANG Chao3, LIU Guoqiang3,4, LI Yanhong3, AN Hui-lin3,4
1. State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China;
2. Hebei Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Field and Electrical Apparatus Reliability, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China;
3. Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract:Increasing the source distance from the recei-ver is an effective way to increase the detection depth of the electromagnetic wave resistivity logging-while-drilling tool,but in this case the received signals are seriously attenuated.In this paper,the principle of resonance is introduced into the electromagnetic wave resistivity logging-while-drilling,and a double-emission and single-receiving re-sonance coil system is used to increase the voltage amplitude of the receiving coil.The scale loop si-mulation formation conductivity is often used in laboratories to conduct research on instrument response characteristics.The calibration method for the double-emission and single-receiving resonance coil system is completely different from that of conventional open coil systems.Based on Doll geometric factor theory,the calibration ring parameter selection of the double-emission and single-receiving resonance coil system is studied,and it is found that the parameter selection should be compromised between the relative degree of stability and the scale ring resistance resolution to reduce the measurement error.An experimental platform is built and open-circuit response characteristics and resonant response characteristics of the receiving coil in a uniform layer are compared.The results show that the resonant method only increases the amplitude of the receive response without changing the amplitude ratio,which verifies the correctness of the scale ring parameter selection and the correctness of the resonance method.
张妙瑜,郭宝龙,仵杰,等.一种新共面线圈系对薄层的响应特征分析[J].石油地球物理勘探,2018,53(3):578-586.ZHANG Miaoyu,GUO Baolong,WU Jie, et al.Response characteristics of a new coplanar coil system in thin beds[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2018,53(3):578-586.
[2]
马哲,李军,王朝阳,等.随钻感应电阻率测井仪器测量原理与应用[J].测井技术,2004,28(2):155-157.MA Zhe,LI Jun,WANG Chaoyang,et al.Principle of tool resistivity induction MWD and its in-situ application[J].Well Logging Technology,2004,28(2):155-157.
[3]
杨震,刘庆成,岳步江,等.随钻电磁波电阻率测井仪器响应影响因素数值模拟[J].测井技术,2011,35(4):325-330.YANG Zhen,LIU Qingcheng,YUE Bujiang,et al.Numerical simulation on influence factors of electromagnetic wave resistivity logging while drilling response[J].Well Logging Technology,2011,35(4):325-330.
[4]
Zhang Y,Xu L,Cao Z.Optimization of the electromagnetic wave resistivity tool in logging while drilling[C].IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques,2014,160-163.
[5]
Li M,Yue X,Hong D,et al.Simulation and analysis of the symmetrical measurements of a triaxial induction tool[J].IEEE Geoscience & Remote Sensing Letters,2015,12(1):122-124.
[6]
张波,疏许健,黄润鸿.感应和谐振无线电能传输技术的发展[J].电工技术学报,2017,32(18):3-17.ZHANG Bo,SHU Xujian,HUANG Runhong.The development of inductive and resonant wireless power transfer technology[J].Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society,2017,32(18):3-17.
[7]
Kazmierkowski M P,Moradewicz A J.Contactless energy transfer (CET) systems:a review[C].IEEE International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference,2012,4-6.
[8]
范兴明,莫小勇,张鑫.磁耦合谐振无线电能传输的研究现状及应用[J].电工技术学报,2013,28(12):75-82,99.FAN Xingming,MO Xiaoyong,ZHANG Xin.Research status and application of wireless power transfer via coupled magnetic resonances[J].Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society,2013,28(12):75-82,99.
[9]
杨健弟.双感应测井刻度方法及测量误差分析[J].测井技术,2002,26(3):247-251.YANG Jiandi.Calibration method for dual induction log and analysis of its measuring errors[J].Well Logging Technology,2002,26(3):247-251.
[10]
仵杰,刘春雅,张甜甜,等.阵列感应测井仪刻度系数特性研究[J].测井技术,2006,30(5):400-403.WU Jie,LIU Chunya,ZHANG Tiantian,et al.A study of calibration coefficient characteristics of array induction logging tool[J].Well Logging Technology,2006,30(5):100-403.
[11]
袁吉祥,吴少威,贺红民,等.感应测井仪器的刻度原理及方法[J].石油仪器,2011,25(1):42-45,103.YUAN Jixiang.WU Shaowei,HE Hongmin,et al.Scale principle and method of induction logging instrument[J].Petroleum Instruments,2011,25(1):42-45,103.
[12]
魏宝君.一种新型随钻电阻率测井仪器的响应和刻度[J].地球物理学报,2007,50(2):632-641.WEI Bojun.Response and calibration of a new logging-while drilling resistivity tool[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2007,50(2):632-641.
[13]
魏宝君,王颖,王甜甜.电磁波电阻率仪器的基本理论及其在随钻测量中的应用[J].地球物理学进展,2009,24(2):774-781.WEI Baojun,WANG Ying,WANG Tiantian.The ba-sic theory of electromagnetic wave resistivity instrument and its application to measurement of while-drilling[J].Progress in Geophysics,2009,24(2):774-781.
[14]
张庚骥.电法测井[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[15]
陈爱新.随钻电磁波测井环境影响分析[J].石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(5):601-605.CHEN Aixin.Analysis of environment influence in electromagnetic logging while drilling[J].Oil Geophy-sical Prospecting,2006,41(5):601-605.
[16]
冯启宁,鞠晓东,柯式镇,等.测井仪器原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2010.
[17]
杨震,岳步江,刘庆成,等.随钻电磁波电阻率仪器吊零刻度原理及试验[J].石油仪器,2012,26(5):23-25,28.YANG Zhen,YUE Bujiang,LIU Qingcheng,et al.The principle and test of the zero scale of the electromagnetic wave resistivity instrument while drilling[J].Petroleum Instruments,2012,26(5):23-25,28.
[18]
仵杰,龚厚生,陈草堂.双感应测井趋肤效应校正和刻度系数计算研究[J].测井技术,2001,25(4):261-265,319.WU Jie,GONG Housheng,CHEN Caotang.On correcting skin effect and calculating scale coefficient in dual induction logging[J].Well Logging Technology,2001,25(4):261-265,319.
[19]
陆承达,董浩斌,王家豪,等.一种电磁随钻信号接收仪器的设计[J].工程地球物理学报,2015,12(4):423-427.LU Chengda,DONG Haobin,WANG Jiahao,et al.A design of EM-MWD signal receiver circuit based on STM32[J].Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophy-sics,2015,12(4):423-427.
[20]
Hou H,Hu Y,Huang D.The filter circuit design and simulation of array induction logging tools[C].IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Processing,2012,829-832.